What the conversation is about now
| Theme | Markets |
|---|---|
| Cost of living | Germany, France, Portugal |
| Subsidies and support | Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden |
| Markets and finance | Austria, Belgium |
| Immigration | Spain |
| Financial distress | Italy |
| Strikes | Poland |
A year ago a single theme led almost everywhere. It now leads in three markets, and what replaced it is not one successor but five. That is the finding: not that the squeeze is over, but that the shared vocabulary is gone.
The two halves of the replacement
Three of the six themes are still about money, just at a different point in the chain. Italy’s financial distress and Austria and Belgium’s markets-and-finance coverage are downstream of the same pressure that cost-of-living coverage was upstream of. Poland’s strikes are the labour expression of it.
The other half is different in kind. Ireland, the Netherlands and Sweden lead on subsidies and support, which is coverage of the response rather than the problem. Spain leads on immigration, which is not an economic story at all.
Cost of living receding as a theme does not mean households feel better. Every one of the eleven markets still reads net-negative on news tone, and nine of eleven sit below their own long-run confidence norm. The subject changed; the mood did not.
Why this matters to a brief
A value message keyed to cost-of-living salience is well-aimed in Germany, France and Portugal and mistimed in the other eight. In Sweden and the Netherlands the live conversation is about who is being helped and how, which is a different register: not “we understand it is expensive” but “here is what you get”.
Sweden is the sharpest case. It carries the most negative news tone in Europe at −1.69, and its consumers sit at par on confidence and still committing to big purchases. A brand reading the Swedish press would brief for a crisis that Swedish behaviour is not having.
Where this stops
This is theme salience: how much coverage volume a topic carries, and which direction it is moving. It is not public opinion, and it is not a forecast. GDELT measures what is published, which is a decent proxy for what is being discussed and a poor one for what is believed.
We also cannot say the inflation rate behind any of it. Eurostat has not published harmonised consumer prices past December 2025 — the series is mid-transition to a new base year and classification — so the Q3 editions withhold the figure rather than quote a nine-month-old one as current.
Method and sources
| Behaviour | Source |
|---|---|
| Theme salience and direction | GDELT GKG theme volume, year-on-year |
| National news tone | GDELT, 56-day mean |
| Confidence and big-ticket intent | Eurostat consumer survey, vs each market’s own long-run mean |
| Inflation | Withheld — Eurostat HICP ends 2025-12 |
A read, not a forecast. Q3 2026 edition, eleven European markets.